It’s time to get flu shots for your family before your house is full of fevers and dripping noses.
1. The flu vaccine is essential for children.
The flu virus is common and unpredictable, and it can cause serious complications and death, even in healthy children. Immunization each year is the best way to protect children.
Each year, on average, 5% to 20% of the U.S. population gets the flu and more than 200,000 people are hospitalized from complications. At least 77 children died from the flu in the 2015-2016 season, although the actual number is probably much higher since many flu deaths aren’t reported and are caused by secondary flu complications such as pneumonia. If you choose not to vaccinate your child, you not only endanger your own child but also others.
Although influenza can be treated with antiviral medications, these drugs are less effective if not started early, can be expensive, and may have bothersome side effects.
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) strongly recommends annual influenza immunization for all people ages 6 months and older, including children and adolescents. In addition, household contacts and out-of-home caregivers of children with high risk conditions and all children under the age of 5 especially should be vaccinated.
Young children, people with asthma, heart disease, diabetes, weakened immune systems, and pregnant women are at high risk for complications of influenza, such aspneumonia.
About half of all Americans get vaccinated against the flu each year, including 50% of pregnant women. This number needs to get better. Ask your child’s school, child care center, or sports coach, “How are we promoting the flu vaccine for these children?”
The family of a 12-year-old girl from Wisconsin who died hours after receiving an HPV vaccine is grieving the loss of their daughter. Meredith Prohaska, described as being an extremely active and healthy girl, passed away on July 30th. 
According to a news report, Meredith’s mother took her to the doctor for a sore throat. At the doctor appointment, she received the HPV vaccine. Later in the afternoon, the mother found her daughter unresponsive on the floor, and she was later pronounced dead at the hospital. The parents suspect the vaccine as the primary cause of their daughter’s death. However, Meredith’s autopsy report rules her cause of death as inconclusive. 
Medical dogma is immune to “new insights,” especially when it comes from a parent on this topic, specifically. Many families also share Meredith’s story; the pain and emotional suffering is all too familiar. 
But despite her death, every excuse will be given to point away from the vaccine – this is called medical indoctrination – and there is a very good reason for doing so. The banal message from medical investigators, likely being to the grieving parents: “We don’t know what killed your daughter, but we know it was not the vaccine … vaccines are proven to be safe and effective. We’re terribly sorry for your loss.”
This is almost the exact message Dr. Geoffrey Swain offered, like a good little parrot, in the news interview immediately following the conversation with the grieving parents. He has an important role calming parents’ fears about vaccines, and his motives to manipulate public opinion were not so obvious, but if you knew he received money from the CDC or an organization that promotes vaccines, you may have a different opinion of him. More on that later in the article.
While it is reported the medical tests for the young girl will take months to get back for an answer, you can take this predictable script from the medical investigators to the bank.
The System is Protected
Did you know, as an example, global sales for Gardasil, just one of the HPV vaccines manufactured by Merck Pharmaceuticals, were $1.8 billion in 2013? 
Did you also know since 2006, over 35,270 adverse events caused by HPV vaccines have been reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)?  This certainly isn’t news to government agencies and it shouldn’t be to you, either.
The same companies that manufacture vaccines also create drugs that are the fourth leading cause of death in the United States – they have a bad track record of leaving a path of death and destruction. [6,7]
I say all of this because the hard-to-swallow-truth is this: profits from selling vaccines are protected by law. Profits from selling vaccines must be protected at all costs. And yes – vaccine manufacturers profit in the hundreds of millions every year, peddling their vaccines to doctors and government agencies.
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-660) created the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). Under this program, vaccine manufacturers (and doctors) are given complete immunity from any legal liability if your child is harmed by their product. 
This law gives parents, like Meredith’s, few options to seek compensation legally. However, this law does not prohibit you from asking your doctor questions about vaccines or to exempt your child from being injected.
Coincidentally, questioning vaccines is the biggest enemy to pharmaceutical profits and the system. And here’s the kicker: For this system to work; you must be convinced to get your child vaccinated.
Adverse Reactions to Vaccines are Usually Downplayed
In society, it is taboo to question your doctor about vaccines, who, more often than not, act like a “Shot Salesman” or a puppet for the pharmaceutical industry, like Dr. Geoffrey Swain, instead of a medical professional.
During the news report of Meredith Prohaska’s death, Dr. Geoffrey Swain, a professor and medical doctor at the Milwaukee Health Department, states, “Vaccines in general and the HPV vaccine in particular, very, very safe. It’s a very safe vaccine and very effective,” and that, “serious side effects are nearly one in a million …” 
Why would Geoffrey downplay the role of vaccines in Meredith Prohaska’s death in a news interview?
Could it be because he received an award from the Centers for Disease Control for over $900,000 to investigate immunization rates? Or possibly because he received over $159,999 from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a vaccine promoting non profit organization, investigating how school-based clinics could increase immunization rates? 
Maybe his roles for the Immunization Task Force for Milwaukee Public Schools, Wisconsin Council on Immunization Practices, and National Immunization Advisory Workgroup, National Association of County & City Health Officials (NACCHO) have some influence on why he promotes vaccines? 
Are you sure there isn’t a hidden agenda?
Whatever his motivations are, Meredith Prohaska’s death is a public relations disaster waiting to happen and her autopsy report must remain inconclusive. Admitting a vaccine is at fault for her death would “scare” other parents into not getting their child vaccinated, and that’s certainly not good for business.
One of the most powerful and effective actions you can take on becoming an informed parent, is to start investigating vaccines right now.
The sudden loss of Meredith Prohaska’s young life ending shortly after being vaccinated is a most tragic story.
Sadly, I predict her parents will not get many answers as to the root cause of her death. I understand many of you reading this story can empathize with her parents because you have also met this medically imposed “wall of silence.”
Nothing could damage the reputation of a company brand more than their vaccine maiming or killing children – this subject is strictly forbidden from being discussed.
Dr. Paul Offit, MD writes about vaccine safety, “each infant would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10 000 vaccines at any one time (obtained by dividing 107 B cells per mL by 103 epitopes per vaccine).” i.e. that an infant can respond to the challenge posed by the antigens in 10,000 vaccines.”
If an infant can respond to 10,000 vaccines at one time, certainly Dr. Offit, in his supreme confidence of the safety and efficacy of modern vaccines and the CDC’s Vaccine schedule, would have no reservation about taking 10,000 vaccines himself at one time.
We petition Dr. Paul Offit, MD of Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia to demonstrate his theoretical proclamation that a human being could take 10,000 vaccines at one time by, in fact, taking 10,000 vaccines at one time.
Should Dr. Paul Offit, MD have reservations about such an action, we petition a smaller dose of 1,000 Vaccines at one time. Vaccines should be chosen from the CDC’s recommended (in some states, mandated) vaccination schedule. Surely, Dr. Offit would have no reservation about receiving 1/10 the theoretical capacity of a human being 1/20th his own weight and size.
The CDC has admitted that between 1955–1963 over 98 million Americans received one or more doses of a polio shot which was contaminated with a cancer-causing virus called Simian vacuolating virus 40 (SV40). The CDC quickly took down the page, along with Google, but the site was luckily cached and saved to symbolize this grand admission.
To further confirm this unbelievable admission, Assistant Professor of Pathology at Loyola University in Chicago Dr. Michele Carbone has been able to independently verify the presence of the SV40 virus in tissue and bone samples from patients who died during that era. He found that 33% of the samples with osteosarcoma bone cancers, 40% of other bone cancers, and 60% of the mesothelioma’s lung cancers all contained this obscure virus. This leaves the postulation that upwards of 10–30 million actually contracted and were adversely affected by this virus, to be deadly accurate.
(NaturalNews) For the past decade and change, he’s been unjustly relegated to “anti-vaxxer” whipping boy status by the corrupt mainstream media. But gastroenterologist Dr. Andrew Wakefield never committed any fraud, and his study in The Lancet linking the MMR vaccine for measles, mumps and rubella to novel bowel disease and autism has repeatedly been affirmed as accurate in the years following its forced retraction.
If you’ve only heard about Dr. Wakefield on television or from other corporate media sources, you might believe that he’s some discredited quack whose supposedly disproven research was financially or otherwise deceitfully motivated. But nothing could be further from the truth — hear Dr. Wakefield tell the full truth in this powerful interview with NaturalHealth365.com host Jonathan Landsman, available through the Vaccine World Summit:
Several years after Dr. Wakefield’s study was forcibly retracted from The Lancet on orders from the UK government, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention senior scientist Dr. William Thompson co-authored a study published in the peer-reviewed journal Pediatricsthat was meant to counter it. The premise of this study basically maintains that MMR is safe and effective for children.
But last fall, Dr. Thompson came forward as a whistleblower with some shocking information: Data published in his paper, entitled “Age at first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in children with autism and school-matched control subjects: a population-based study in metropolitan Atlanta,” had been manipulated and altered to create the illusion that the MMR shot is safe and doesn’t cause adverse effects.
Based on the information publicly provided by Dr. Thompson, which is now being extensively reviewed by a U.S. court, MMR isn’t actually safe, and it does cause autism. In fact, the true data that was omitted from Dr. Thompson’s study affirms, rather than denies, the findings of Dr. Wakefield’s study in The Lancet.
“Here is a man with a very troubled conscience who was involved in the design, the conduct, and the analysis of vaccine safety studies who admits, in his own words, that he has been responsible for deceiving millions of taxpayers about vaccine safety,” explained Dr. Wakefield during his interview with Landsman.
“It’s not my opinion alone that MMR vaccine, or many vaccines, are associated causally with autism. It is the opinion of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and it is the opinion of senior scientists at the CDC as well, as of many, many, many thousands of parents who have experienced this injury first hand in their own children.”
The full interview with Dr. Wakefield is available through the Vaccine World Summit:
As far as the data presented by Dr. Thompson and his colleagues, their case-controlled study, if presented accurately and honestly, would have clearly shown that children vaccinated with MMR during the first 36 months of life were more prone to develop autism than other children. This effect was especially pronounced in African American boys, who were found to have a 340 percent increased risk of autism from MMR.
Content with just endlessly accusing Dr. Wakefield of committing fraud and slandering him throughout the press, the mainstream media has been completely absent in addressing the bombshell confessions of Dr. Thompson. And a re-analysis of his study conducted by biomechanical engineer Brian Hooker, who presented the original data as it should have been presented, was subsequently retracted without valid cause, further exposing the foul play involved in protecting MMR from scrutiny at all costs.
Be sure to listen to Dr. Wakefield tell his story in his own words at the Vaccine World Summit:
IF YOU LIKE THIS POST PLEASE LIKE THIS PAGE Dyslexia Autism And Adhd Kids .”
Spain now joins a growing list of countries where criminal lawsuits have been filed against manufacturers of the HPV vaccine, which includes France, India, Japan, and many more.
In the United States, however, you cannot sue the manufacturers of vaccines, as they are protected from civil criminal prosecution. As a result, marketing efforts to increase the sale and distribution of the HPV vaccine are increasing.
Gardasil: Criminal complaint filed in Spain
June 19 2014, Logroño, Spain: Attorney Don Manuel Sáez Ochoa filed a criminal complaint against Merck-Sanofi Pasteur Laboratories, Spanish National Health authorities, and the regional health authorities of the La Rioja province on behalf of Zuriñe Jiménez Guereño and her mother Doña Maria del Carmen Jiménez Guereño for injuries and disabilities suffered by Zuriñe after the administration of Gardasil.
The complaint states that Merck Laboratories failed to use an inert placebo during clinical trials, thereby manipulating data and marketing Gardasil under false pretences. Despite complaints of several young women with similar new medical conditions after Gardasil injections, the Spanish health authorities ignored calls for a moratorium on the use of Gardasil until the safety issues were resolved.
Both regional and national health authorities made no attempt to verify the accuracy of the safety data Merck submitted to gain approval for the widespread administration of Gardasil as a cancer preventative; nor did they make any attempt to inform the public that an already proven safe and effective means of controlling cervical cancer was already in existence.
The complaint goes on to say both national and local health authorities had adequate knowledge regarding the potential harmful effects of Gardasil and chose to recommend administration of the HPV vaccine anyway. The complaint alleges this showed an absolute disregard for the health and well-being of young Spanish girls.
According to the complaint, the attitude of the Merck pharmaceutical company and Spanish health authorities (both national and regional) before, during and after the administration of Gardasil shows they care nothing about the risk to which medical consumers expose themselves whenever Gardasil is used.
The complaint states, prior to administration, no one was concerned about possible adverse reactions to the vaccine. When adverse reactions did occur, those who experienced them were treated with contempt leaving them in a state of helplessness. There was allegedly not one single official inquiry about the girls’ post-Gardasil conditions even though they were healthy prior to being injected with Gardasil.
An outcry from the public calling for a moratorium on the use of Gardasil until safety issues were resolved was ignored by Spanish health authorities. Injections of Gardasil continued despite the damage left behind.
According to Attorney Don Manuel Sáez Ochoa,
(claiming) a possible exemption arguing that they did not know at the time of processing, the dangers of the vaccine (Gardasil) is laughable……Frankly this attitude seems clearly malicious and constitutes the offense of injury as per Artile 149.1 of the Criminal Code that states: To cause another, by any means or process, the loss or worthlessness of an organ or principal member, or a sense, impotence, sterility, severe deformity, or severe somatic or mental illness, shall be punished with imprisonment of six to twelve years.
Charges contained in the official criminal complaint
Merck-Sanofi Pasteur, Spain’s National and Regional (La Rioja) health authorities are charged with the following:
- fraudulent marketing and/or administration of an inadequately tested vaccine;
- failure to inform the public about the potential risks of using Gardasil;
- clear infringement of the right to informed consent;
- ignoring new medical conditions in those who used Gardasil despite the similarity of their symptoms and the relatively short period of time between vaccine administration and the onset of symptoms;
- ignoring established and new scientific evidence illustrating the potential harmful effects of Gardasil ingredients and manufacturing methods;
- callous disregard for those suffering new medical conditions post-Gardasil;
- failure to inform the public that HPV infections are simply one of the risk factors involved in the development of cervical cancer;
- failure to inform the public that 90% of all HPV infections clear on their own without medical intervention;
- failure to inform the publlic about alternative methods of controlling cervical cancer; and
- criminal liability for the injuries resulting from the administration of Gardasil
Even if one assumes that Merck-Sanofi Pasteur and all of the government health officials were not aware of the potential risks and lack of proven benefit of Gardasil, there has been plenty of scientific and medical evidence provided since 2007 when the vaccine was approved for use in Spain.
Given their expertise, all of these people were aware of the fact that there are several methods to control cervical cancer that have already been proven safe and effective.
Zuriñe was a healthy, athletic and academically gifted girl until she received the recommended three doses of Gardasil via an immunization program at her school when she was 13 years old. Three weeks later, she was admitted to the emergency room of her local hospital suffering from a multitude of symptoms including dizziness, fatigue and convulsions.
After receiving no answers from her doctors, the conversations began to include hints of conversion disorder. Her parents decided to take her to a private specialist.
According to this specialist, Dr. Mark Mazzuca:
Zuriñe suffers severe cell disease, oxidative stress linked to a demineralization of her body. To put it graphically, she is an 18 year old girl locked in a cell body of a person over sixty years old. Zuriñe also suffers from hard infield Ortostátiaco Postural Syndrome polyneuropathy revealing a central character. It also presents as liver and bladder inflammation.
Five years after her last Gardasil shot, Zuriñe’s life bears little resemblance to anything she once considered normal. In and out of hospitals dealing with ‘mysterious’ new medical conditions every day. No one knows how much of her normal life she will be able to regain.
Thousands of young women around the world are finding themselves in the same position as Zuriñe. They have gone from being happy, active, and healthy to facing a multitude of autoimmune problems and neurological disorders. For them, the ‘possible’ adverse effects of Gardasil have become an all too harsh and brutal reality.
It is time for those responsible to be held accountable for their actions. Criminal prosecution is quite possibly the only way to accomplish that goal.
Perhaps six to twelve years in prison would remind those responsible what it means to conduct yourself in an ethical manner. Perhaps they would remember that their first duty is to maintain the public health, not destroy it.
An earlier REALfarmacy article attacked Johnson & Johnson’s baby products by revealing several lawsuits in the works for their baby powders and other products. One of the other products was Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Tylenol, which contains acetaminophen.
Included in that article was a dispute over their lawsuit’s dismissal by the parents of baby Tracen Sherfey. Tracen, only a few days old, died after administering Baby Tylenol, as instructed by their doctor, to help Tracen recover from a surgical procedure shortly after birth.
The surgical procedure was installing a colostomy bag internally because Tracen’s was not developed enough upon birth. He was victim of a rare developmental disease called Hirschsprung’s Disease (HD), which is noticed if the baby doesn’t have a bowel movement within 48 hours of birth. The bowel is not developing, according to mainstream medical science
The parents had contended that particular stock of product was defective or tainted, Johnson & Johnson knew it but had not recalled all the defective products. Sometimes the defect is too high an amount of acetamenophen. Unfortunately, Tracen’s parents made some material errors that made it easy for a judge handling their final appeal to overturn their suit.
That type of lawsuit usually succeeds within a class action suit when there’s an abundance of indisputable evidence. This wasn’t the case with the Sherfeys whose only evidence in their favor was the bottle of cherry flavored liquid Baby Tylenol, but it was thrown away.
Acetaminophen Boosts Vaccine Injury Risks
But does a Baby Tylenol need to be defective to be dangerous? Anything containing acetaminophen can be dangerous by itself. It attacks the liver. Too much acetaminophen can kill an adult by causing total liver failure. OTC drugs containing acetamenophin cause more ER than any other pharmaceutical.
Amazingly, the “standard of care” for vaccination adverse reactions involves using Tylenol to “reduce the fever and pain”. Great, just when the baby’s immune system is under attack from toxic vaccine materials or the trauma of an operation and toxic drugs used as anesthesia, add a known liver toxin to reduce symptoms.
Then the liver can’t be of enough use for ridding all those toxins and the lights may go out. Acetaminophen hampers the liver’s glutathione production. Glutathione is the master antioxidant produced in the liver. It even refreshes other spent antioxidants and recycles them. If that production is hampered sufficiently, the whole immune system goes south.
The FDA issued a warning cautioning doctors to not prescribe any drugs with more than 325 mg of acetaminophen. But that warning is for prescription drugs, and it’s for doctors who may or may not read it. Tylenol is not a prescription drug even though you may be told to use it post vaccination or to “reduce fevers”.
Tylenol, Motrin, and Nyquil are OTC drugs containing acetamenophen, and if there is a production error or malfunction it may have more than can be handled under adverse conditions. This may have been the case with baby Tracen.
Not only was Tracen’s liver taxed with the trauma and toxins from the operation, he had also been given the hepatitis B vaccine, both very shortly after being born.
There have been several studies confirming that exposure to aluminum, thimerasol (mercury), formaldehyde, and other toxic materials in vaccines, then combining those with acetaminophen is an invitation to disaster in the form of autism spectrum disorders (ADS) or total out of touch autism, or death.